M horse pure 2 android one

1 Dollar Center: Free Shipping + Low to $0.99 for All Special and Cute Electronic Accessories!

Up to 67% OFF Year End Sale, EXP:Dec.31,freeshipping@focalprice. com

GPD Win Gamepad is the world's first 5.5 inch handheld PC & gaming console based on Windows 10 OS. 1280 x 720 px capacitive touch display, Intel Atom X7 Z8700 64 bits Quad Core 1.6GHz-2.4GHz CPU a

Save $80 on a Dell Home P2016 19.5" LED LCD Monitor for $109.99 after instant rebate with free shipping

Women's Watches: Up to 60% OFF and Low to $2.30 for 2000+ Styles

Speakers and Microphones: Up to 46% OFF + Low to $1.40

The OS as a whole fits somewhere in here, including its overall performance and reliability. Reds on the 2 XL are a little dead.

Links for Quarter Horses

Indications are here that the screen's fine. You can decide with your wallet, and so can I. Pixel 3 will have wireless charging anyway. 7 inch android phones how to unlock Would I still buy one for myself? I can list several reasons why I didn't choose the S8, N8, V30, etc. I always get Spigens, slim armor or rugged armor.

What's New

Then there is Knox and locked bootloaders. The only thing I really notice is the cooler shift when viewing from the side Odds and end chips like wifi and accelerometers cost about that also all together.

Newest Categories

I can not deal with burn in, easy color tints or grainy displays all at the same time on a phone that already costs insufferable amounts of money and have other shortcomings. They aren't getting paid to say jack shit. Please kind sir what does bias mean? That's because you're a fanboy. Plus lack wireless charging.

Free download m horse pure 2 android one nacional convivencia

12.02.2018 - The reason the jack got removed because no one cares and believes what Apple did is correct. Yep, if they are bacteria — but you'll have to wait a few hours so it can penetrate the plaque and then the lipid coating, and hope too many spores don't form in the meantime to cross-infect. Can I give you a common routine for me? Can't see lots of value in turning it in to rocket fuel and there is a serious poisoning risk. If that one low score is your personal deal-breaker, so be it - but it's no reason to flame anyone else over their personal opinions. I've got it before. The software is practically flawless, it just works so well.

Kills with pistols m horse pure 2 android one the

21.03.2018 - Bought it from companies that supply lab supplies. I picked up a Pixel XL this year and its very fast, guess what, its new and hasn't been used and abused yet, and the battery life is great. So that's why moonshine is illegal to make. So you're paying for the software and sub-par hardware inclusions. I would hate to be jaded about a screen that looks more realistic than the over saturated crap that Samsung puts out. I can keep going on and on but I really hate how for one company its unacceptable but perfectly fine for another company. It's sold mostly to people making Limoncello:

For android does m horse pure 2 android one home edition

Well, not the XL, but the smaller version -- I'd be a fucking retard doing that seeing as the display has severe issues. But since I can buy it for almost half the price outside my country, I'll get it.

Either that or the OP5T. But that doesn't change the fact that the Pixel has some clear problems and shortcomings and its competitive phones being better in many ways. The fact that it lacks a headphone jack.

The fact that the QC is God awful. The fact that it is extremely overpriced. The fact they release a phone with an SoC that's almost a year old by the time it's out.

The fact that Google does not understand phone design. Or to anyone who buys a Pixel 2 XL, you're a "fucking retard" according to a user in the comments of an AndroidPolice article.

I actually never called anyone anything for buying the XL, but rather criticized your claims about what other phones lack compared to the XL and did so pretty maturely. But I guess your incapability to act like a grown up and accept that you were wrong on some things like claiming Samsung displays are inferior because they're oversaturated, has forced you to put words in my mouth.

It's completely ok having and liking the XL. But trying to ignore its glaring issues or hyping its different qualities to be vastly better and more important than they actually are, reeks of fanboyism.

I never stated Samsung made inferior displays? Merely that I don't enjoy the saturation levels put in place by Samsung, once again, my subjective opinion. I also didn't put words in your mouth, just used logic to reason that the "I'd be a fucking retard doing that [buying a Pixel 2 XL]" statement you made, can be reduced to "One who buys a Pixel 2 XL, is a fucking retard.

Yes, you are totally wrong, because you can easily choose sRGB mode one of the best in the industry at that, even more accurate calibration than what you find on the Pixel on display settings.

This very fact renders your argument invalid. I specifically referred to myself because of the standards I have when it comes to displays. I can not deal with burn in, easy color tints or grainy displays all at the same time on a phone that already costs insufferable amounts of money and have other shortcomings.

And now you've opted to calling me a troll, despite the fact that I've done nothing but put forth reasonable arguments -- in fact I've done so more than you. But I guess when you have lost a debate, throwing dirt on the opponent is the last resort But the over saturated colors and TouchWiz overlay is God awful.

The best screen ever-made can't cover up TouchWiz. Then there is Knox and locked bootloaders. No thanks on any samsung devices. Plus slow updates because of the overlay What is it with people and their incapability to understand that there's a display setting to change the color mode sometimes I wonder if you guys are iOS users, who don't understand that on Android we got alternatives?

It's been on Samsung phones since their inception. And it has a "Basic Mode" which has been awarded the most color accurate display several generations Note 4, S6, Noye 5, S7, Note 7 , and is one of the best on the market -- noticably better than the Pixel, mind you.

Is it to make yourselves feel better about a purchase made of their own? And to be quite honest I've tried owning a Samsung, and absolutely hated it. I'm a purist and minimalist I never tried to justify purchasing a Samsung phone in my answer to you -- where did you even get this idea from?

I probably value smoothness more than you, which is the main reason I haven't had a Samsung device as a daily driver for years -- it has almost exclusively been Nexuses, OnePluses and a Pixel.

Because frame stability, animation smoothness and consistency, is hugely important to me. But this wasn't about what phone to buy. It's about your incompetence about the subject you're talking about.

Namely, calling Samsung devices "over saturated colors" that are "God awful". The fact of the matter is that a simple change to Basic Mode on display settings actually makes the Samsung devices some of the most color accurate displays on the market -- it's more accurate than even the Pixel.

You not being aware of this leads me to believe that you've either not owned a Samsung device or that you're too incompetent to go into display settings don't forget, on Google Nexus 6P and Google Pixel, both of which also had saturated colors on default, you had to go into a developer settings to change it -- an even more "difficult" task and change it.

You of course completely skipped over this, which was what my entire answer to you was based on, and made the discussion about something completely else. There's a whole world out there outside of the US, you know.

People in other parts of the world can get all their phones unlocked, and are not fucked by carriers like Americans are. When using it directly, the screen is entirely comparable to any other device.

When looking at off angles, it has it's issues. But I never use my phone without looking direct at it so it's only noticed when it's forced out. However the OS and performance is beyond any Android ever.

It's actually impressive how fast this is. Same processor as other Android devices, but it does everything a second faster, or doesn't seem to have a single bit of hesitation when doing what you ask of it.

Switching between apps is instant. That phone has significant issues with touchwiz, and always will. It all depends on where you put your money priorities which is quite a personal thing Me for example would never buy a Samsung phone, all the great their screens are due to the lack of updates, that to me is worth paying the 1K alone regardless of the screen wich may not be a flagship one but good enough for my use case That said Google just dropped the ball on that one with the SMS debacle but even then, everyone else in the android ecosystem is just plain worst I think some of you guys are missing the "Opinion" keyword in the title and start bashing the writer, who is he fanboy then?

No phone is perfect. You as the consumer gets to choose what aspects of a phone matter more. For me, it's unacceptable to buy a phone that has bloatware and slower updates.

That's what I personally care about. I'm definitely bummed the Pixel 2 XL screen isn't better, but I'm still keeping my preorder because it still checks enough boxes, and checks more boxes than any other phone for my personally.

There's nothing "kinda sad" about paying for a phone that has the best camera in a smartphone, timely updates when is the WPA2 security issue going to be patched on other Android devices? I wouldn't pay for a Pixel 2 XL new either but there's nothing "kinda sad" about someone else's values.

Kind of sad for future updates you only accept last years software update and one new one everytime you buy a phone. More like "Woah, no way am I spending this much money on this screen when there is better for cheaper!

And all in one package? You mean security patches? Pixel only gets software updates every 12 months LOL. Better user experience is subjective, as you can't do a lot of things on Pixel that you can do on a Samsung.

Better battery life is not built into Pixel, in fact many phones with smaller batteries got better battery life than Pixels. Touch latency is lower on Note 8 than on Pixel and Pixel 2.

Better cameras - I might give you that, even though they are complete rubbish in very low light. That is a big deal. I'll agree to your point regarding user experience. Touch latency is decidedly not lower on the Note 8, with every reviewer commenting on how the Android experience on the Pixel 2's are unparalleled.

David mentions it above and he's used both phones extensively. And the Pixel 2's camera will only improve over time. Especially with the news regarding the Pixel Visual Core custom Google chip.

David also says how many crashes and restarts he gets. Perhaps it will get better, but right now it is what it is as we have no proof of this. Touch latency is lower on Note 8, you can't dispute this as it's been tested already.

Also security patches are meh. Most people don't even know whats in them, most of the time they don't even matter. Having updates for 3 years sounds great, until you get the updates and they break or remove functionality, your phone performs worse than before as Dave and Artem have attested to also in this article, battery life decreases etc etc etc.

I haven't seen a single review comparing battery life properly. Wait till GSMArena publishes one or some youtube videos pop up - but going by the previous Pixel which reviewers also said the same thing, and turned out to be pretty average and got worse quickly.

I've owned in excess of 35 Android phones over the years. I don't find this many display issues acceptable from any modern flagship. While my apixel 2 XL Panda has not shipped yet, I'm hoping for the best.

He already answered your question: It's a question of priorities and off-angle viewing isn't one for apparently quite a few folks. Maybe not your personal cup of tea, but over-dramatizing it doesn't do anyone any good.

What's the most used feature on a phone, yep the display! I don't care how good the phone is. I wouldn't except anything less. Plus they have already started with this back ordering baloney!

One of the great things about Android is that you can buy a different phone instead. There are lots of options depending on what features you care about. I disagree that the display is the "most-used feature.

My most-used feature of my phone is the processor, probably tied with the RAM, and followed closely by the on-board storage. The OS as a whole fits somewhere in here, including its overall performance and reliability.

Next is likely the radios. Then the screen is what I use to interact with all of that. I think there's a very good argument to be made for a phone that prioritizes doing all of those other things better than others and possibly letting us down on the screen and still being worth owning.

I'll wait to see how mine looks when it arrives, but I suspect I'll feel similar to David based on my experience with the first-gen phone. This was just stupid. Without a screen you couldn't do anything lol.

Without a radio I could still use the phone. What a terrible argument you have there. It's useless as a phone. It becomes the equivalent of an iPod Touch, except not even, as it would have no WiFi.

And without the OS, yes, you could install any old OS, but you wouldn't have the advantage of the OS that was built alongside this system. We buy this phone for how good its OS integration is. That's a major component.

The point was that people have different priorities. You can decide with your wallet, and so can I. You gotta bone up on those reading comprehension skills, bro.

Enjoy your CPU and memory and radios. I will enjoy the complete package that provides much better value for money, actually had high quality hardware and software for less!

I say the same about Samsung software I find that way more offensive than a screen. He cares enough to reply to pointless comments but not the content of those pointless comments.

If upvote both comment and an article is for agreeing with something, then downvote would be? If i was you or david and got the phone for free from google i'd use it as my daily too.

Like I told him: Replace the battery in the 6P. I can keep this phone for another year easily now and I may have to after seeing this Pixel 2 XL garbage. That's just not true. You can deduct expenses as a business that are not deductible for normal tax returns.

The tax rate is the same but not the taxable income. You're fighting over a few dollars that come back to you at the end of the year. That's not going to affect his review of the phone.

Not sure what it matters how a device is paid for, it's still helpful for those seeking information. So by that logic, we can't trust the word of any reviewer because they can't value the phone properly since they either get it for free or its a business expense.

Actually, the black and white had like a month longer wait, so I canceled that order and got the black. Don't really care since I'll have a case on. What case are you getting? I hate cases personally..

I feel they add bulk and make the device unwieldy.. Y'all are getting paid. That's the only reason you can make excuses or give GOogle a pass on this BS of a screen they shipped to all of you all.

They aren't getting paid to say jack shit. If you think AP and especially Artem and David are always singing Google's praises, you haven't been paying much attention. I had two XL's die on me and I am on my 3rd and still grumble about how shit Bluetooth is on it but my fingerprint senor has been amazing!

I am put my hand in my pocket and by the time I bring my phone out it is unlocked ready to go, is it really that slow? The Pixel XL is slow - 1s or longer. The OnePlus 5 is insanely fast - 0.

I've got the original Pixel and, provided it's clean, unlocks in 1s max. And the screen is the main thing you are looking at when using the phone So yeah it sucks big time. Whatever you are going to use your phone for - you will use the screen.

If it's really that bad - colors are trash - enjoy your experience. I guess you are obsessed with Google, only some delusional person would deny it. You're determined in every thread to ignore everyone's points and harp on the screen in a way that lacks comprehension of differing priorities, to the point of being convinced a less-than-ultimate screen destroys the entire experience.

EVER skimp on these things. Obviously there comes a point where they're good enough, and that is generally subjective to each person. The fact remains that they are definitely the most important things to get right.

On a phone, that would be the touch panel, then display second. And every indication is the touch panel is top notch. And the display is, from what I'm hearing, still quite good.

Just not up to the same level as the best of the best. I remember when my mother was car shopping years ago, and she was comparing a Subaru and a Honda Civic. The Civic was obviously the better buy, but she couldn't get past the fact that the Subaru had the number one safety rating.

Indications are here that the screen's fine. It's not spectacular, but it's fine. Do we all want spectacular? But if the screen's fine, and the rest of the phone is spectacular, for many of us it averages back out to spectacular.

Although the display not being pleasing to look at is more like saying a car has Porche performance but looks like a Camry. It's unfortunate that it looks like a Camry instead of a, but a whole lot of people would still want to drive it because the performance is amazing even though it isn't a looker.

Some people might also be thinking "hey a Camry doesn't look that bad" Well in this analogy the wouldn't exist and the Samsung would be a pretty Italian sports car with quirks and problems: I should hope its snappy for a brand new phone I picked up a Pixel XL this year and its very fast, guess what, its new and hasn't been used and abused yet, and the battery life is great.

Give it a year and the battery life won't be as good as it is now. As for finger print scanners, anything that is quicker than having to swipe or type a code is better. Moaning about a 1s delay, which I don't personally see on mine, is pretty sad.

If I spent that much on a 'flagship' phone that has a shitty display and any of the other reported problems I would want my money back for that price! I can accept that many people will be fine with this screen, but from what I can tell, it's objectively worse than the 1XL screen.

In what way do you think it's a huge improvement? Not real sure, I just put them side by side, and the 2 xl just looks better, not color wise or anything, just looks crisper and clearer. Almost like higher resolution.

It's also been reported it's actually image retention, not burn in. I had the retention, played a video for 30 min full screen and the image was gone and the screen was back to normal.

It's retention, not burn in. Please don't spread misinformation like has been happening. People called it burn on before trying to see if it will go away.

Well then, by that logic we also can't rule out that it won't transform into a Decepticon, since it's too soon to be sure. Last I heard Google was investigating, so I guess it could go either way https: And that's a totally rational argument you have.

As soon as the Pixel's screen is on par with Samsungs I'll switch. I'm doing the exact same thing. I've been stopping in at my local store to look at the Note8 as a backup purchase in case I can't handle the screen.

Fingers crossed that things will be ok by the time mine ships. My Pixel 2 is quickly becoming my favorite phone. It takes gorgeous pictured, has a gorgeous display, feels good and it works so well.

It's fast, smooth and elegant in operation. The question I want to have answered about the "drab" screen is: Is it actually sRGB accurate? Like, I use my Nexus 6P set to sRGB mode in the developer options, because anything other than that looks ridiculously garish and horrid.

Does it look like that, or does it look drabber and browner? It's pretty accurate, I think, but the Pixel 2 is noticeably more vibrant. Reds on the 2 XL are a little dead. I agree, but the burn-in or image retention is very worrying.

If it doesn't get too much worse too quickly, it's no problem.. The "burn-in" is almost certainly uneven pixel wear, which means that it should stabilize as the phone gets used more. This is being reported so badly.

Does this happen with early use with any other android phones with oled panels? I hope your right, cause my pixel 2 xl definitely has image retention. Not sure, but when I was in the Verizon store last week the Note 8 had serious burn in.

Granted those displays are worst case scenario for the phone but it definitely can happen with Samsung's latest as well. No, it's definitely more extreme than on other phones, but look at the screenshots: What you see is that the area in the navbar with the pixels on is the same brightness as the rest of the screen that normally shows content, and the black area of the navbar is particularly dark.

Burn-in wouldn't cause the lit-up area to look the same as the rest of the screen, and you can't burn-in the black part that's different. Uneven pixel wear is a known thing with OLED and plasma displays, but this one is definitely worse -- maybe it didn't get enough break-in time at the factory or something?

But the good news is that uneven wear should mitigate over time, not worsen. I don't care if burn in happens a month in as long as my warranty is good to go. In Google we trust. Let's all get the Google G tattoo to show are support.

That's because you're a fanboy. You are as blind as a bag of rocks. I'd go as far as labeling it a major flaw. Critical is a bit much. The thing is not everyone wants the same things from their phones.

To some hardware is important, I'm not one of those and I think neither is David. My XL is coming in a couple of days and only thing I'm worried about is the the banding effect and the actual size of the phone.

I pre-ordered Panda Pixel 2 XL day one from my carrier. Should I cancel and get the smaller one instead? Smaller pixel has far better audio according to phonearena, louder speakers bigger one is inconsistent between top and bottom speakers, fewer issues with display and same camera and features.

Vote with your wallet and cancel it. Maybe they'll actually quality check their hardware next year. My 6P has burn in on the nav bar as well as the notification bar. I only noticed it when I started looking for it, but it's about as bad as the pics of the 2 XL I've seen.

Which is not bad enough for me to have noticed until I specifically started looking for it. I'll wait for my 2 XL to arrive before judging it. I'm going to lose this nomenclature war, but same thing: That's uneven pixel wear, not burn-in.

It's the BLACK part of the navbar that is different from the rest of the screen, brighter from the pixels not being used as much. Burn-in is when something that's displayed gets stuck on the screen, uneven pixel wear is when areas that are not used retain their initial brightness longer than the areas of the screen that are used.

Now, here's some scary looking burn-in my buddy sent me today on his OG Huawei Watch. I've been seeing all the articles pop up about the Pixel 2 XL's problems, but I've been so happy with mine since day one.

Sure, it's not the best screen in the world, but my smartphone doesn't need to be the best screen I own. I'm not experiencing any burn in and my panel appears to be non-defective so far. My battery life is better than any phone I've had, my photos turn out amazing, squeeze for Google Assistant is the most convenient "gimmick" on a phone, the speakers are loud as hell, and everything is just so snappy.

I remember when you used to be the resident AP curmudgeon that everyone bashed for being too negative on everything, David. Now you're the pixie dust fairy saying everything is just fine, and everyone is bashing you for being too positive.

There's just no pleasing people, eh? With that said, I disagree with you on this one. I've voted with my money and returned mine, and will continue to rock the Pixel XL until something else catches my eye.

I dont understand it. Yet because Google made the phone it gets a pass. How is the screen garbage yet the phone is amazing? When you look at a smartphone how often are you looking at the screen? Battery life you mentioned degraded over time.

Its only been a week since you had that phone so the jury is still out in that department. I can keep going on and on but I really hate how for one company its unacceptable but perfectly fine for another company.

Doesnt make any sense at all unless you have a soft spot for a particular company or getting paid by them. David does that a lot kissing google's ass, bashes the others.

The Essential phone didn't even have a chance due to software issues, but here the hardware gets a pass. I wanted to love the Pixel 2 XL but I have to wait until they fix the screens and make sure nothing else pops up.

I think most of the people who were buying Nexus devices and now Pixel devices were doing so because of the software not the hardware. Once it made it to the flagship prices people, myself included, expected flagship quality.

Not sure you entirely understand what the word "biased" even means, my friend - especially for an opinion piece. You pick one feature and call the whole thing trash. If a reviewer did that, they'd be crucified.

Most reviewers and people in general, even base their reviews on multiple things, you see. They've done it this way for ages The good, the bad, the ugly If all parts get a 10 but one, and that part gets a 6 or 7, the overall review is going to be positive.

If that one low score is your personal deal-breaker, so be it - but it's no reason to flame anyone else over their personal opinions. Maybe the bias here isn't theirs?

Maybe some of you need to step back and ask youselves why it is you simply cannot accept that there are some reasonable people out there who actually do like this device - even if you do not.

Because these same people disliked a device because of it's minor issues. Even wrote the device off for issues more minor than what this phone has. For that the evidence point towards being biased towards a company.

Please kind sir what does bias mean? I thought it meant: But I could be wrong. The way you use the term, it's like it's something special reserved for people who don't like what you like.

Enjoy what you like. Let them enjoy what they like. It's not your job to defend your own choices or to pretend all the ire is some ridiculous "turnabout is fair play" BS.

All that does is make you look as bad as they looked to you when they "disliked a device because of it's minor issues. As the most important thing on a smartphone. The screen issues are not minor. Not hating as I really wanted to love the new Pixels.

I'm saying hate on them all. And if reviewers are honest they would hate on all not just some. You seem butt-hurt because of the Pixels mishaps being called out.

My complaint is with you and everyone else that is hating on anyone who doesn't hate it as much as you do. The Pixel2 XL is still one of the best android phones this year regardless of this flaw mentioned in the article because the flaw does not take away from all the other great things about the phone.

Mine is arriving in the mail tomorrow, and I am sure it will be awesome! If this does happen which by the way doesn't happen for every single 2XL, you simply RMA the phone and get another one, they do not all have screen burn-in.

Also the screen burn-in is only on the notification bar and it's easy to not notice it unless you are actively searching for it. You're right, the screen is something we always look at but we also always interact with our phone and the Pixel 2 XL trumps every other android phone by a pretty sizeable amount when it comes to UI interaction, touch response and consistently smooth performance.

It's probably the closest a Android phone has ever gotten to iPhone levels of UI smoothness and performance. That's a very huge plus to some people and may outweigh the draw backs of the display for them.

A beautiful screen is nice but so is having a very polished and smooth smartphone experience and a lot of other high end smartphones fail in that regard and the ones that are acceptable, probably still feel unrefined and janky in comparison to the XL2.

How the fuck did you get through college with that kind of reading comprehension. Is that why you spend so much time crying on Disqus over something that would have never fit on your budget anyway?

You must be retarded or something with those elementary schoolyard insults. I just don't think people should have to settle for a phone with a crap display when they paying top dollar.

OnePlus get bagged for their display issues but their phone is half the price. I keep seeing people saying that the screen is calibrated to sRGB when no one has actually checked to ensure that this is indeed correct, also, I see the people who have checked the calibration say that the phone is not accurately calibrated to sRGB, as seen on the video from Erica Griffin here at around the 7: Maybe more measurements should be done by some independent parties before we repeat the information from Google's marketing material.

Fanboys just lap this crap up without actually measuring if it's true. Just because it's targeting the sRGB colourspace doesn't mean it's accurately rendering content in that colourspace.

I see your Pixel 2XL love And it's probably the phone that will lock my into buying Pixels only. The software is practically flawless, it just works so well. The size is great, I love having a 1 handed device again - The Camera and the power under the hood in such a small form factor is great.

As well as some youtube videos or gaming sessions during that 4hr SOT sessions? Bluetooth yes, but I don't use GPS much. That has been working wonders all year, and I'm assuming Google has done a ton of optimization.

I considered switching my preorder. Google swapped my 6P with the Pixel XL and while that phone was fine, I just wanted something even smaller. You could have sold it since the XL that replaced your 6P was brand new and just went and bought the smaller Pixel 2 version.

Wasn't going to get much more than that selling it. I am using the Pixel 2 coming from a Note 8 and it is the best phone I've ever used. Highly considering cancelling my XL 2 order and selling the Note 8.

But the phone is just way too big for me The Pixel 2 is pretty much the perfect phone for me. I really don't have any complaints, and that's a first. Probably because those bezels have stereo speakers that you can actually hear instead of cupping your hand on the bottom of your phone just to hear anything.

Apple is giving you a notch. An ugly notch permanently burned into the iPhone X screen, which will be noticeable and distracting every time you use it. What are you even talking about iDiot?

We're not even talking about anything that you do anything with, as the thing we're talking about hasn't even been released yet. Go back to "doing things" and minding your business.

If you look closely at the iphone 8, you can see each and every pixel individually Yeah, that's why I asked for IPS panels. None of them are. And there exists an abundance of problems with many other flagship phones on the market.

Here are just some snippets of the Galaxy Note 8 review from Android Police, this very same site:. I just don't think Samsung's made the case for a dual camera setup here. There are so many unnecessary legacy features lingering in this skin, I practically get itchy every time I open the settings app.

And no, iris scan and face unlock aren't just as fast - I have to turn on the screen first to use those, and that will never be as quick as just using my finger to do both at the same time.

And because the scanner is right next to the camera module, you'll still end up accidentally smudging your lens at least once a day. It's not the best smartphone speaker out there, not by a long shot, but it generally gets the job done.

Is it any good? Colors are noticeably more subdued, details oversharpened, and processing just a bit harsh overall. It gives photos a cold, digital feel that smartphone cameras a few years ago tended to suffer from.

That's not to say it's bad. But given what you can achieve with the primary camera, the secondary one feels a bit shortchanged. It runs at the same resolution p using the same chipset. For one, the fingerprint scanner, while I think fast enough, is pretty miserable in most other regards.

Compared to phones like the Moto Z2 Play or the OnePlus 5, the Note8 takes only a bit longer to unlock, but oftentimes the scanner won't even respond with a failed read buzz if it doesn't think you actually meant to touch it.

Compared to the LG V30, I found the Note8 simply failed to recognize I was touching the scanner at all by a factor of five times or more. You have to get your finger on there just so, and with a phone this large, that's not an easy ask.

For one, Samsung's notification bar feels almost comically clunky when compared to the effortlessly smooth Pixel's, and the home button can feel a bit slow to respond, too While not as smooth as the Pixel or as rapid and manic as the OnePlus 5, the Note8 cuts a good slice between the two in terms of overall performance.

Yes, the settings menus can be labyrinthine, and yes, the phone still annoyingly "sleeps" apps that it deems you don't use very often. This unlocked Note8 will even serve up notifications if a third-party app is using certain permissions frequently shocker: There remain years of legacy features lurking in the various menus, and Samsung seems more content to bury rarely-used settings rather than do away with them, lest they upset a single customer who continues to utilize Smart Stay.

Are we pretending you could afford it anyway? Doesn't matter that performance and camera are generations ahead of the competition. I am really torn as to what to do. I have Note 8 and Pixel 2.

I absolutely love the Pixel 2 but of course want it to be bigger. I have the XL 2 on order for mid November and cannot decide whether to cancel or not. I plan on keeping some combination of 2 of these phones and I guess selling the other.

I am very into photography and screen quality but the Pixel 2 experience blows the Note 8 out of the water. I always have a top phone to hand down to my wife or lend to a friend and I occasionally sell a particularly overzealous purchase for a small loss.

I can get past all the issues with the display except for screen burn-in. I expected nothing less from an android website. I understand that but in my opinion the pixel is overrated af.

Don't be fooled -- Most people who like Android understand that the whole idea behind the Pixel is trash. I could have sworn a Google rep issued a statement that while the charger included is only 18W, the devices can charge at the full speed of USB-PD 3 - or 27W.

I guess it was. Missed the updates to that story. USB-c power delivery is god awful though after coming from a oneplus 5. It's like I went back in time. People who haven't used a Pixel don't understand.

Its not just stock android, the software is so buttery smooth. No other Android phone on the market comes close to it. Its iPhone levels of smooth. It's way smoother than the iPhone.

The iPhone has entered disaster territory. But I completely agree with you. I have the Pixel 2 and just cannot use my Note 8 anymore. Actually, OnePlus comes pretty close.

But still, buttery smooth doesn't justify the price. Neither does the screen or the fuck ups on basic shit. I know not everyone agrees and thats completely fine but I value the software experience and timely updates the most.

The display issue is blown out of proportion. I tested it at Verizon and the display was not as bad as I was expecting. This is after I was pissed off after seeing all the issues on the internet and close to cancelling my preorder.

I'll wait and see when I get my preorder whether I'll stick with it, right now I think I will. So is it worth upgrading from previous Pixel? The phone would have been fine with one flaw.

This many, however, and it's no longer near acceptable, not to mention not ready for market. Burn-in after only a few days, and of course in true Google fashion a bunch of software bugs -- This is proof that Google never killed Nexus, it just put an extravagant price tag onto the old brand.

Who knows if a replacement will be any different but the support experience from the Google Store is impressive. Thanks for the perspective. I've been debating about whether or not I still wanted to get this phone after all the screen issues.

The issues are a bummer but I'm pretty sure that personally I won't notice them enough to bother me day to day. But now the reviewers are still defending it's a minor flaw they can live with.

May be true if you get the phone free. This kind of opinion should only be on personal facebook. I read the article and I it sounds a bit like this. Phone has serious flaws like screen, lacks functionalities that competition has Jack, QI but it's still the best phone just because it has Oreo and a good camera For me it's way not enough to be the best and would pick a Galaxy S8 over it any day.

S8 is not horribly overpriced, has a headphone jack, SD card slot, great camera as well, software-wise Samsung Nougat wrecks stock Oreo when it comes to functionality. It pretty much lacks only notification channels and system-wide autofill API.

Google forgot that making the phone as expensive as iPhones requires something more than taking a Nexus, renaming it to Pixel, slapping in a better camera and raising the price 3 times.

But the S8 doesn't run stock Android, I don't know why but for some reason that instantly makes it awful according to tech sites. I don't really get this stock Android mania as well. Sure, it looks quite nice and is a bit faster I guess but other than that it's nothing really special to brag about.

Don't underestimate the 'power' that getting in and out of a device a couple or few seconds quicker eighty times a day has over some people. Except the difference is less than a few milliseconds at best.

The performance delta between the Pixels and Samsungs is highly overestimated. It's a solid second just in the fingerprint sensor to unlock. Note 8 vs OP5. When everything is quicker When the normal hang ups happen on Samsung's software that doesn't seem to happen on other phones That adds up also.

When you have to wait after scrolling for it to register a touch, that adds to it. When you have so many options, it makes day to day things take longer also. As in more clicks to get to what you want.

Their sms app is the perfect example of this. Having a separate app store that doesn't want to be turned off is another thing that slows you down. Because you are constantly having to uninstall or hide apps that you don't want need.

But you have to keep that app store for certain things you use to work. It all adds up. Samsung makes a great phone. No doubt about it. But what makes a Samsung great, also makes it the worst.

Yeah, the comparison is against the Pixel, not OP5. The OP5 has the fastest fingerprint sensor out there, bar none, even the Pixel 2 is significantly slower. The OG Pixel has a slower fingerprint than the S8.

Outside of that, the S8 is a few milliseconds slower at opening apps from cold, and comparable to the Pixel 2 in multitasking. It adds up, sure, but not at the exaggerated rate some people claim it to be.

It's not about speed, but smoothness. About frame stability, animation smoothness, minimal amount of lag, jitter and jank. They're a stuttery mess with animation jank and frame drops all over the place, in comparison.

And these interfaces also have a tendency to degrade on all the above mentioned points over time. It's precisely for these reasons I only use devices by Google or OnePlus. I don't care about speed, I care about the software experience: Unlimited Storage is a big Plus for me and my wife, so yeah, i love those 4k and hi res pics originals.

The screen issue can be fixed and we can get replacements, i hope i don't have to but i am ok waiting if i have to. What is the real advantage of Oreo apart from "being stock Android" that don't really appeal me anymore?

I have Picture in picture mode, actually even more because I can put every app in a resizable window, move them around, minimize, built-in theme system that is actually quite good and allows me to use black theme right away not like Google's approach - we use OLED screens now, let's make the whole system completely white so it uses as much power as it can and don't give a capability to change it, good power management so my battery life is OK, screen color modes, Dex mode which will be even more functional in the future with Linux on Galaxy, backup system that backups also call logs and SMS so I don't have to use separate apps for that, one handed mode, secure folder, built-in ad blocking system wide capability have to use an app for that but still that don't lock your VPN slot and show notifications.

I would be very interested to hear what the general public thinks of this phone versus bloggers and tech enthusiasts because things just don't add up. The sales figures will give you that answer.

I suspect they'll be even worse than the Pixel and Pixel XL, which sold 1 million in 7 months. In fact, after owning the XL for a year, I can't see myself ever using non-stock Android.

If I can't have that, I might as well buy an iPhone. General public couldn't give less shit about running pure android and get incremental updates couple months faster than others.

Only nerds on tech sites care about that. I feel that HTC deserves some credit for how well they built both original Pixels and the smaller Pixel 2. If they stuck to HTC, we wouldn't have the issues that we have now.

I'd much prefer they just play it safe and stick to HTC, who's been doing a great job, as opposed to taking a risk with another company. Wasn't hTC the one responsible for the large bezels? Pixel, Pixel XL, Pixel 2: There would have likely been smaller bezels in the original Pixel if they had more time.

Planing for the original Pixel started 18 months in advance with Huawei, but that fell through 9 months in, leaving HTC 9 months too make a phone that was actually really good. As for the Pixel They could have found a way to make the bezels smaller still Lol I think they are doing it to force people to get the pixel 2 xl.

Of course they are. The sad thing is that the display issues will likely push people towards the smaller one if they don't fix it quickly. These display issues are inexcusable for a flagship phone at this price, they should offer everyone who bought the XL a free replacement.

The problem is though, that they have to change displays completely. That will likely take at least a month or two, unless they can quickly find and fix the issue, but that's unlikely.

Anyone who has screen burn in should be allowed to trade in a phone for a replacement for free. Same for the iPhone 8. That doesn't mean it will still be sold out six months from now like the last Pixel.

Difference is that the original Pixel was sold out for months, making it a big new story when they were available for all of 15 minutes. No the difference is Google let everyone know that screen procurement was the biggest speed bump last year.

They invested in LG to fix the issue. I'd go into year two hardware company and why they don't overdo it on initial orders but that would take too long. This dude was trolling all the good phones everytime he made a review, now he picks the biggest fail from the flaghips this year as his daily driver Except the core point is it's NOT the biggest fail.

Sounds like, minus a notable flaw, it's still a spectacular phone. The Pixel was roundly slammed by commenters who didn't own it as a giant fail too, and yet those of us who used one quickly found it was the best phone we'd ever owned.

I went through a variety of issues with mine, including two warranty exchanges. I can be brutally honest about problems I had. And yet despite those issues, it still handily beat everything I'd ever had previously.

Sounds like the same may be the case here, where the benefits handily outweigh the flaws. The first Pixels were not perfect but they were great phones. This one are just a big fail - at least the XL.

I don't see how. They sound better in nearly every way except the screen. People claimed, and still claim, the originals were a big fail as well for whatever their chosen pet reason was. Your chosen pet reason for this generation is the screen.

It's like Nilay Patel saying his favorite phone is an iPhone. I agree with him for the most part but the screen burn-in issue after a few weeks is hard to deal with. I'm not concerned with the price of any phone.

Manufacturers set the prices and consumers have the option of buying or not buying the phone. Lastly, I just got a shipping notice from Google while I was typing this comment.

My 2 XL should arrive by tomorrow. I'll judge the display for myself and see if it's a deal breaker for me. Most definitely have to include two different color modes. It's the only way to shut up the bloggers looking for advert clicks.

Then those gain enough traction to cause the respectable blogs to cover it. Thus adding to the drama. That is why I would have looked at recent events with other companies and made sure to have accurate and vivid color modes.

Thus eliminating at least one paragraph on every 'the screen sucks' story. Stay away from the Bellroy 'made for google' leather case. They looked super nice so I ordered one.

Came today and it's going straight back. It's great for dehydrating tissue and is used as a cheap short term fixative. You want this stuff in your body? Also some companies put additives into the EtOH to prevent twits drinking it.

Mind you if anyone wants to drink it I would prefer they did, hopefully before procreation, so such idiocy can be removed from the gene pool. It's difficult to find.

Most alcohol is sold in Australia is It's also very expensive — it costs almost twice what other vodkas cost, even the purer ones. You're also going to be flavouring it, so I'm not not convinced there'll be a great or very noticeable difference in the end product.

That's the highest you will get in Australia in a shop and it is good stuff. Anything higher is considered like munitions, you need to prove that you need it and for what and that you know what to do with it like a chemistry teacher in highschool.

I've got it before. You probably bought degree proof alcohol https: Less than degrees proof or underproof was too wet to allow the gun powder to ignite. Pharmacists can buy a certain volume each month.

However to sell it we need a prescription. In theory we are accountable for its sale. Bought it from companies that supply lab supplies. I have made Limon cello a few times nIw with vodka and its fine.

Can't see lots of value in turning it in to rocket fuel and there is a serious poisoning risk. It's called Absolute Ethanol: It can be ordered here: This would be the one then, cheap too considering the alcohol content although maiking your own would be cheaper for larger quantities.

You can get almost pure ethyl alcohol or ethanol the active ingredient in all alcoholic beverages using fractional distillation https: Interesting thing here for those interested in a little chemistry.

It is not possible to distill a water and ethanol mixture to anything more concentrated than This is because water and ethanol form what is known as an Azeotropic mixture.

With ethanol this is commonly benzene or cyclohexane. Also water can be removed by use of calcium oxide which reacts with the water to form calcium hydroxide a solid that can be removed by filtration.

Other methods include the use of molecular sieves - ceramics that have a strong affinity for water and can be removed when they have done their job. Benzene is a powerful carcinogen and the trace amounts left in the alcohol would probably best be avoided.

Methyl is the denaturant for Ethyl, a poison which deters people from distilling. I was wondering this question when we were distilling salt water in High School. Surprised the teacher explained it to a curious 9th grader.

Anon Was Here writes It's shame they can't sell E in service stations for fuel, just because of some nasty, stupid people. Surely, the recipe doesn't call for moonshine and only moonshine to be used.

I hope i am not the only person who read the title and thought, That's going to kill alot of germs. At some stage we were low on stock and unable to order it any more as we needed a license to buy it.

The liver converts it into Gammahydroxybutrate or GHB. If you mean as a drink? That won't be the reason. The higher concentrations are typically made by adding something with a greater affinity for water than ethanol, such as anhydrous copper sulphate.

Generally processes that don't associate well with stuff for human consumption. My favourite usage for high grade alcohol that I've seen was the ultimate PC liquid cooling rig — submerse the entire motherboard in a bath of it.

And keep a fire extinguisher close by! Count me a skeptic that any Joe Blow can buy pure ethanol that you could add to any lolly water and safely get shickered on the cheap.

In my book it's either doctored so you can't drink it, or you're paying hefty excise on it. Yep, if they are bacteria — but you'll have to wait a few hours so it can penetrate the plaque and then the lipid coating, and hope too many spores don't form in the meantime to cross-infect.

As far as many viruses go, it could be pretty useless:. Don't believe everything the adverts tell you — especially if you are adolescent and think "medicated soap" will stop acne.

It will, but only in the same way a flame-thrower will kill weeds in the lawn I couldn't locate the clear grain in Jan in Aust. However I just found this supplier Distillery King who has confirmed it's the same process used to create Everclear but Australian grains are used.

Please don't do this. Despite the name there are very few that are denatured with methanol. Both to remove the toxic effect and to prevent distillation. Last 2 Know writes I'm pretty sure distilling methylated spirits will give you methylated spirits.

I was looking for a second local source, other than Jim's Cellars. Looks like Jim has cornered the market here? I don't like monopolies. You could try this: You can't really buy anything over It absorbs moisture from the air.

Its very expensive though. But for goodness sake don't use vodka, all you get is a second-rate sweet lemon vodka drink, not Limoncello. Is Australian metho like Diggers safe to use in a spirit burner?

I just got a Trangia spirit stove and tried with some Diggers metho without really thinking. AFAIK there are no problems. I've never heard of any safety warnings as far as combustion products are concerned.

Just ensure there is some ventilation so there's no shortage of O 2 for the humans present. You would need a license to buy unadulterated food grade alcohol. As mentioned the stuff available from chemist, Bunnings etc has been treated to make it un-drinkable.

He probably won't get it for you unless you are known to him and he's happy with your proposed use. I say this because someone in another forum says they get it from their chemist. Probably not by the bucketful though.

I think you should email the seller and ask is it suitable for use in food and fruit syrups. I'd have thought they would have specified Poison or First Aid if Swallowed on the label if it was denatured.

The label is not legible, so I can't see what's on it. You could taste a bit on your finger, it will be awful if denatured to stop people drinking it, though I'd still wait to hear back from the seller before using it in anything.

It's strange that the web site doesn't show prices? I'd certainly be surprised if someone has found a way to avoid excise on pure alcohol. It just can not be extracted via distillation because water and ethanol create a azeotrope which means they boil at the same temperature at a certain mixture ratio.

It doesn't matter for alcohol that is consumed, some chemical reactions however can be prevented or changed by the presence of water so it's a mostly industrial use scenario. I made a wooden fruit bowl and coated it with shellac which is food safe but should be used with ethanol as a solvent.

With the stuff they add to Methylated spirits I doubted it was food safe so I ran a cheap bottle of vodka through a water distiller which got it concentrated enough to use as a solvent. Archive View Return to standard view.

The highest proof vodka runs up to around or so I think? I asked at a bottle shop when got back, apparently it's illegal or something in Australia. P Could be possible if there was a way of purifying it some how.

I'm after the pure ethanol stuff. Not sure which chemists you've been visiting, but I'd bet they are not compound pharmacies. I get my regular supplies from my local compound pharmacy.

Try your local compound pharmacies. The initial costs are high, but over time you save a ton of money. Its a good idea not to drink metho tho. Formate is toxic because it inhibits mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase, causing the symptoms of hypoxia at the cellular level, and also causing metabolic acidosis among a variety of other metabolic disturbances Hypoxia at the cellular level is essentially oxygen starvation of the blood cells.

If youre making money out of it, then yes. Regardless of making money. It is illegal to distill ethanol in Australia without an approved excise calculating device on the distilate outflow think of it as an odometer for your still http: OpenDocument Its very dry reading.

Its very dry reading. So that's why moonshine is illegal to make. What do you need it for? Nevermind, read the OP properly lol! Divide it by 2 to get the percentage. Also, that is rum which wouldn't work for this sort of thing.

Even a home still will allow you to remove Methanol pretty safely. Methanol boils at 65degC Ethanol boils at 78degC The whole concept behind distillation is that methanol boils off first and is thrown away the heads.

The technique you describe is molecular sieving and is also described in the link below http: Feel free to "water down" your alcohol with some vodka anyways. Anyone know how to make that stuff? What do you want it for Brayden?

The thick and yellow limoncello uses Xanthan gum to thicken its about the only thing that will thicken ethanol Ah HA! You are a legend, sir. Next lot of lemons is becoming Limoncello.

I may have a go at making some this weekend. I wonder if it's possible to make Zucchini-cello?! CSR Distilleries sell 44 gallon drums of How much limoncello would that make?

You would need them by the truckload. I accidentally spilt some in my cordial again! It has begun, now to wait 2 weeks for the zest to steep. I use a Microplane to do the zesting in that picture.

D If i walk past the place again this week ill note down the name. I've been looking for an excuse to get one of those! Jesse's examples are very useful, too.

I would ignore that molecular sieve side of things, but its still hard work. I had a shot of the stuff. It was very smooth, but tasted terrible. The second you open it, it will absorb moisture from the air.

I am assuming this is laboratory grade? You can get HPLC grade. P I have some lovelllllllly limocello just waiting for the right occasion ;. For God's sake Do Not use isopropyl alcohol for food stuffs This!

It's not munitions, it's just technically difficult and expensive to make compared to It will also absorb water from the air and try to make itself get back to You probably bought degree proof alcohol Nope.

You can try it first. It came in a brown bottle. That's going to kill alot of germs Yep, if they are bacteria — but you'll have to wait a few hours so it can penetrate the plaque and then the lipid coating, and hope too many spores don't form in the meantime to cross-infect.

As far as many viruses go, it could be pretty useless: Kings Proof Neutral Grain Spirit http: That's making for expensive Limoncello! Could you not just distil methylated spirits?

Could you not just distil methylated spirits No. I'm pretty sure distilling methylated spirits will give you methylated spirits Only 1 way to find out I guess and try it for myself.

Software m horse pure 2 android one 2003 excel

I've been using the Google Pixel 2 XL now for over a week. Its predecessor, the Pixel XL, is what I called the best Android phone ever six months by David.

08.02.2018 - Finally an article with a pragmatic perspective. I'd imagine a case that covered the button would have made it less likely to be hit though. Limencello isn't nearly as bad as grappa though. Oneplus loop vr headset how to use magnets - Your... And if you buy enough of the alcohol, I think they ship free And it has a "Basic Mode" which has been awarded the most color accurate display several generations Note 4, S6, Noye 5, S7, Note 7and is one of the best on the market -- noticably better than the Pixel, mind you.

For m horse pure 2 android one ventaneando con.

10.02.2018 - The reason the jack got removed because no one cares and believes what Apple did is correct. And the display is, from what I'm hearing, still quite good. One plus 5t price in india do they believe - Amp s... The software is practically flawless, it just works so well. The design of the 2 XL is, I would argue, a very big step forward, too. Thanks for the perspective.

Bit m horse pure 2 android one movies.

17.02.2018 - You can try it first. I'd say the flaw here is pretty minor in the grand scheme of things. I disagree that the display is the "most-used feature. One plus 5t price in nepal 3 star - Liquor store n... Then there is Knox and locked bootloaders. Especially with the news regarding the Pixel Visual Core custom Google chip.

Please kind sir what does bias mean? I thought it meant: But I could be wrong. The way you use the term, it's like it's something special reserved for people who don't like what you like.

Enjoy what you like. Let them enjoy what they like. It's not your job to defend your own choices or to pretend all the ire is some ridiculous "turnabout is fair play" BS.

All that does is make you look as bad as they looked to you when they "disliked a device because of it's minor issues. As the most important thing on a smartphone. The screen issues are not minor.

Not hating as I really wanted to love the new Pixels. I'm saying hate on them all. And if reviewers are honest they would hate on all not just some. You seem butt-hurt because of the Pixels mishaps being called out.

How the fuck did you get through college with that kind of reading comprehension. Is that why you spend so much time crying on Disqus over something that would have never fit on your budget anyway?

You must be retarded or something with those elementary schoolyard insults. I just don't think people should have to settle for a phone with a crap display when they paying top dollar.

Fanboys just lap this crap up without actually measuring if it's true. Just because it's targeting the sRGB colourspace doesn't mean it's accurately rendering content in that colourspace. I see your Pixel 2XL love And it's probably the phone that will lock my into buying Pixels only.

The software is practically flawless, it just works so well. The size is great, I love having a 1 handed device again - The Camera and the power under the hood in such a small form factor is great.

Apple is giving you a notch. An ugly notch permanently burned into the iPhone X screen, which will be noticeable and distracting every time you use it. What are you even talking about iDiot?

We're not even talking about anything that you do anything with, as the thing we're talking about hasn't even been released yet. Go back to "doing things" and minding your business.

Here are just some snippets of the Galaxy Note 8 review from Android Police, this very same site:. I just don't think Samsung's made the case for a dual camera setup here.

There are so many unnecessary legacy features lingering in this skin, I practically get itchy every time I open the settings app. And no, iris scan and face unlock aren't just as fast - I have to turn on the screen first to use those, and that will never be as quick as just using my finger to do both at the same time.

That's not to say it's bad. But given what you can achieve with the primary camera, the secondary one feels a bit shortchanged. It runs at the same resolution p using the same chipset.

For one, the fingerprint scanner, while I think fast enough, is pretty miserable in most other regards. Compared to phones like the Moto Z2 Play or the OnePlus 5, the Note8 takes only a bit longer to unlock, but oftentimes the scanner won't even respond with a failed read buzz if it doesn't think you actually meant to touch it.

Are we pretending you could afford it anyway? Doesn't matter that performance and camera are generations ahead of the competition. I am really torn as to what to do. I have Note 8 and Pixel 2.

I can get past all the issues with the display except for screen burn-in. I expected nothing less from an android website. I understand that but in my opinion the pixel is overrated af.

Its not just stock android, the software is so buttery smooth. No other Android phone on the market comes close to it. Its iPhone levels of smooth. It's way smoother than the iPhone.

The iPhone has entered disaster territory. But I completely agree with you. I have the Pixel 2 and just cannot use my Note 8 anymore. Actually, OnePlus comes pretty close. But still, buttery smooth doesn't justify the price.

Neither does the screen or the fuck ups on basic shit. I know not everyone agrees and thats completely fine but I value the software experience and timely updates the most.

I'll wait and see when I get my preorder whether I'll stick with it, right now I think I will. So is it worth upgrading from previous Pixel? The phone would have been fine with one flaw.

The issues are a bummer but I'm pretty sure that personally I won't notice them enough to bother me day to day. But now the reviewers are still defending it's a minor flaw they can live with.

S8 is not horribly overpriced, has a headphone jack, SD card slot, great camera as well, software-wise Samsung Nougat wrecks stock Oreo when it comes to functionality.

It pretty much lacks only notification channels and system-wide autofill API. Google forgot that making the phone as expensive as iPhones requires something more than taking a Nexus, renaming it to Pixel, slapping in a better camera and raising the price 3 times.

But the S8 doesn't run stock Android, I don't know why but for some reason that instantly makes it awful according to tech sites. I don't really get this stock Android mania as well.

Sure, it looks quite nice and is a bit faster I guess but other than that it's nothing really special to brag about. Don't underestimate the 'power' that getting in and out of a device a couple or few seconds quicker eighty times a day has over some people.

Except the difference is less than a few milliseconds at best. The performance delta between the Pixels and Samsungs is highly overestimated. It's a solid second just in the fingerprint sensor to unlock.

Note 8 vs OP5. When everything is quicker When the normal hang ups happen on Samsung's software that doesn't seem to happen on other phones That adds up also. When you have to wait after scrolling for it to register a touch, that adds to it.

When you have so many options, it makes day to day things take longer also. As in more clicks to get to what you want. Their sms app is the perfect example of this. Having a separate app store that doesn't want to be turned off is another thing that slows you down.

Because you are constantly having to uninstall or hide apps that you don't want need. But you have to keep that app store for certain things you use to work. It all adds up. Samsung makes a great phone.

No doubt about it. But what makes a Samsung great, also makes it the worst. Yeah, the comparison is against the Pixel, not OP5. The OP5 has the fastest fingerprint sensor out there, bar none, even the Pixel 2 is significantly slower.

The OG Pixel has a slower fingerprint than the S8. Outside of that, the S8 is a few milliseconds slower at opening apps from cold, and comparable to the Pixel 2 in multitasking. It adds up, sure, but not at the exaggerated rate some people claim it to be.

I would be very interested to hear what the general public thinks of this phone versus bloggers and tech enthusiasts because things just don't add up. The sales figures will give you that answer.

I suspect they'll be even worse than the Pixel and Pixel XL, which sold 1 million in 7 months. In fact, after owning the XL for a year, I can't see myself ever using non-stock Android. If I can't have that, I might as well buy an iPhone.

General public couldn't give less shit about running pure android and get incremental updates couple months faster than others. Only nerds on tech sites care about that. I feel that HTC deserves some credit for how well they built both original Pixels and the smaller Pixel 2.

If they stuck to HTC, we wouldn't have the issues that we have now. I'd much prefer they just play it safe and stick to HTC, who's been doing a great job, as opposed to taking a risk with another company.

Wasn't hTC the one responsible for the large bezels? Pixel, Pixel XL, Pixel 2: There would have likely been smaller bezels in the original Pixel if they had more time. Planing for the original Pixel started 18 months in advance with Huawei, but that fell through 9 months in, leaving HTC 9 months too make a phone that was actually really good.

As for the Pixel They could have found a way to make the bezels smaller still Lol I think they are doing it to force people to get the pixel 2 xl. Of course they are.

The sad thing is that the display issues will likely push people towards the smaller one if they don't fix it quickly. These display issues are inexcusable for a flagship phone at this price, they should offer everyone who bought the XL a free replacement.

The problem is though, that they have to change displays completely. That will likely take at least a month or two, unless they can quickly find and fix the issue, but that's unlikely.

Sounds like the same may be the case here, where the benefits handily outweigh the flaws. The first Pixels were not perfect but they were great phones. This one are just a big fail - at least the XL.

It's like Nilay Patel saying his favorite phone is an iPhone. I agree with him for the most part but the screen burn-in issue after a few weeks is hard to deal with.

I'm not concerned with the price of any phone. Manufacturers set the prices and consumers have the option of buying or not buying the phone. Lastly, I just got a shipping notice from Google while I was typing this comment.

Thus eliminating at least one paragraph on every 'the screen sucks' story. Stay away from the Bellroy 'made for google' leather case. They looked super nice so I ordered one.

Came today and it's going straight back. Only a thin sheet of leather on top of a cheap plastic case, with a sharp seem where leather meets the plastic. Thanks for the heads up, I was about to order that case in the caramel color for the Regular Pixel 2.

I dunno man, considering the screen is the thing you look at I read all of the articles and then went to the Verizon store to see for myself. The Pixel 2 XL screen looks great.

I never look at my screen off angle so this is a total non-issue for me. It was most visible on a white screen. I strongly dislike the over-saturated colors of the Samsung. I really like the natural colors of the Pixel and the Apple phones -- their colors are very similar.

The phone is fantastic. One can nitpick about it but in normal use it is just as good as any other screen, and better than Samsung for people who prefer natural color to exaggerated color.

I wouldn't put great and screen in the same sentence with the xl 2. You clearly haven't bothered checking out Samsung's multiple screen options. There's a reason their screens are so highly rated - it's because they're bright, clear and accurate.

I will leave this here for you. This is the height of fanboyism. I defended that phone to the death until it became unusably slow and I replaced it with an S5. Doing so made realize just how awful the GNex experience really had been.

The Pixel family's only advantage is rapid updates, period. The sad thing about the Android ecosystem is you're forced to choose between that and a decent display or anything else good.

I personally wouldn't buy this but I don't get the fuss over reviewers enjoying the software experience on these phones as much as they do. I love my pixel 2xl l.

Calling the screen garbage is a little much the colors to me are fine sure if I hold it next to my old pixel XL or an s8 the colors will seem dull.. I don't notice any blotchy colors or grain so maybe thats an individual case by case problem.

The only thing I really notice is the cooler shift when viewing from the side But it's not horrible only really noticable on light back grounds and other colors at more extreme angles over all it's still an amazing phone.

All this talk has been freaking me out about my order that comes this week. I finally went and checked out the device that someone at work already got and man the complaints are so overblown it's unbelievable.

Reminds me of all the complaining about the N6. So it could be just a bad batch. I was one of the first people to order one though so I just hope it was the first batch with issues.

Some people's grain looks awful same with the cooler viewing angles mine have been fine, barely noticeable. If this was a post on Reddit, this article would get downvoted so hard with a bunch of comments complaining about it.

Pretending you actually read the thing. Why don't you go cry on some headphone support group about the death of the headphone jack, or pretend you've read enough about software to judge real-world performance by looking at spec-sheets.

You have to remember - the original Pixel 2 XL was scrapped. This is a different phone. The original Pixel 2 XL would have looked like a blown up version of the actual Pixel 2. Pixel ultra never existed lol.

It was a hoax and confirmed a hoax by the guy that The rest of your comment is accurate though. So the Pixel XL, which used to be amazing, and the best phone ever created on Earth, last year, is described here in those terms:.

The industrial design and quality of the materials were fine, but they didn't scream "premium" in the way the phones' prices did. Almost all of which issues didn't exist on the Galaxy S7 Edge, which was nonetheless worse than the Pixel XL according to you.

Aren't you a tad too fan of Google? Well, it depends on what you value and how much you value it. It seems like David's 1 priority is the software experience and he values that much more than anything else.

Haha thanks I was actually looking for the first link you posted. David needs to stop with those opinions piece since no one else on the site does opposite him. Unfortunately this crap Pixel gets praised everywhere.

Zack from Jerryrig literally made this phone look like garbage and yet here we are. I guess we as consumers are nothing, because these biased tech shilling is paying them enough. The reason the jack got removed because no one cares and believes what Apple did is correct.

It was a mistake. I typed hastily, the article was super cringey. Did it occur to you that? I don't think you can even own any of the products I own kid. Gtfo go and talk with your date on these issues.

Almost all of which issues didn't exist on the Galaxy S7 Edge, for instance, which was nonetheless worse than the Pixel XL according to you. You are aware that different phones have different problems and present different trade-offs, right?

Just because the S7 didn't have the same problems the Pixel XL had doesn't mean that the S7 didn't have problems. In fact, you may or may not feel the problems of the S7 are more substantive than those of the Pixel XL, as the author here does.

Why aren't you using it? What problems are more substantive than rapid battery degradation and crappy cell reception pixel has? So, can you tell me what the objective main issues of the Galaxy S7 Edge were, and how they made the user experience objectively worse than the Pixel XL?

Many people seem to overvalue getting the newest os over the myriad of features that other phones may have, it is slightly odd really the way things like android 6 or 7 suddenly become unusable just because a newer version is out.

Newer update is not what's overvalued. It's the software experience: In that regard, S7 failed. I mean, I do this for a living and money isn't even an issue for me. I still chose the OP3 over the S7 Edge without looking back, because of the OP3's superior interface which was snappier and smoother.

I also preferred it over the Pixel, which outside its similiar interface and great camers, was a terrible phone in terms of design, build quality, battery, etc.

Ask the author, not me. I've never owned or even used either phone, and I know little about their specifics. As someone who has owned the S7 Edge for 9 months..

I can't stand the S7E anymore. I hate it so much, that this is shortest amount of time I've owned a phone in the last 10 years. My biggest issues is the the curved screen is a gimmick accidental touches, hard to touch sides buttons.

But other things that annoy me the fingerprint scanner sucks. I know the screen is meant to be strong, but mine has picked up so many scratches. Also the software, it's still nougat and still covered in samsung bloat.

Can't remove the calendar, phone, sms, samsung pay, samsunng connect, samsung health etc I regret not getting the PixelXL back then, because I'm sure if I got it, I wouldn't be looking at a new phone right now only 9 months later.

Yeah and how are those S7 Edge's holding up? Samsung never bothered fixing their awful memory management. Can't believe how much the press fawned over the Pixel as if it was the greatest phone every just because Google made it look a bit like the iPhones they were used to.

Any other manufacturer would have been slated for the issues pointed out in this review. Massive bezels, slow fingerprint scanner, no waterproofing, shitty battery life, worse build quality than your average Chinese phone Google charged iPhone 7 prices for the original Pixel.

Try selling a pixel now and see if it's worth anything near as much as a used iPhone 7. Where is the "Promotional" notice or tag for this? I really, really wanted to buy this phone but waited until the reviews were un embargoed, and I am sooo glad I did.

In case AP hasn't noticed, the screen is the primary way you get and see info on your phone!! I was at a point where I really needed a phone when the reviews came out due my cracking my phone screen my fault.

To the people saying you can live with this screen: Let's call it what it really is: How can I say this? Because if Google were to address all the screen issues such that they were providing panels as good as Samsung's by January, you'd be screaming bloody murder for a replacement device.

You know you would. Fret not, though, as Google probably can't right that ship this year, so you won't have to eat crow. You know what some of the die hard screen defenders here remind me of is the rare person you'd meet that would say the horrid "The Phantom Menace" and the other Star Wars prequel garbage were great.

Couldn't be convinced at all otherwise no matter what. Everybody is complaining about wireless charging not being included but in truth it is useless. I'd much rather have my phone fully charged in 1 hour than have it wireless charging for 4 hours.

In my opinion current wireless charging is just a gimmick which people are now wanting because the iPhone now has it. And for all the people complaining about a headphone jack, I can bet that next year Samsung will also remove the headphone jack and so will a lot of other popular smartphone companies.

I just can't stand all the hate right now. Finally an article with a pragmatic perspective. I mean, yeah sure Samsung phones have better screens, but they also have:.

Apps we don't want 5. Features we didn't ask for 7. Terrible fingerprint scanner placement. Bixby can be disabled and you still have Google Assistant I'm using Bixby Button Remapper on my note 8 and it brings up the camera instead, no root needed either.

You can turn it completely off can't you? I never bothered to remap mine, but I was constantly hitting it. I'd imagine a case that covered the button would have made it less likely to be hit though.

So most peeps probably didn't hate it as bad as I did. Yeah you can turn off but if you hit the button it'll come on. Objecitvely is significantly lower in the Note 8, xda developers did a great objective analysis of this compared to the Note 7.

Not quite as snappy as the Pixel but damn close. Or maybe figure out what they're capable of and you might be surprised. Same answer as above, don't use them if you don't want them and still benefit from the best screen.

While the Pixel won't ever get some of the features you will already have on your Samsung If that doesn't work for you don't use the fingerprint scanner, you face, use iris, use pin the more secure method if you care about security, can't change your iris, face, or fringerprint, but you can change your pin.

Difference being David called them out for this on the Note 8. Here he is riding and sucking on Google's dick. With that said what I'm gathering from this is that this is a good for a Google phone but not great compared to say something like the Samsung phones.

I'm not sure this is the reputation Google wants to be developing for their self branded devices. I mean if the price were cheaper like the previous Nexus phones I'd get it, a solid all arounder with a sub-par screen but great software and camera for a good deal.

It's not that though, it competes at a price point with other phones that have far superior screens your primary input and output of the device, features like wireless charging and dual cameras they don't offer.

So you're paying for the software and sub-par hardware inclusions. Just seems like an odd fit, though again I'm still glad it's there and I'm glad people are enjoying it. Everything is truly subjective in the end and this is all through my own experiences and choices where years ago I decided screen quality would be a top priority from devices that I primarily look at screens with and smartphones are almost all screens in the end.

I have a hard time going back to a point where I don't care about screen quality that much, unless I'm never looking at pictures, videos, very visual web pages, games, etc I mean I guess it's like getting a gaming computer with the best software but a crappy screen.

Or say getting a 4K blu ray player but a crappy screen. I don't really see the point, but then again I don't have to and I'm happy for anyone happy with their choices. I get that David values the software experience and things like better fingerprint scanners more -- and this is clearly his own opinion.

Heck, I almost never wear sunglasses so the circular polarizer that he likes so much is of limited use to me -- but to each his own, I guess. Let's not minimize this: Unlike the fingerprint scanner, which you can operate your device without some individuals don't even use it for 'legal reasons' , you literally can't make do without a display.

It's central to smartphones so we can't gloss over it. Also, I may be mistaken but my understanding is that display panels are the single most expensive component of a smartphone these days outside of the SoC it may even be that the display is pricier than the SoC.

None of the other components on the Pixel 2 XL scream like they should drive the price that much higher. Basically, the money seems like it's paying for a 'small batch' premium and not much else.

Regardless, it's simply unacceptable that, at that price point, you have to make a sacrifice -- after all, that's why Sammy's getting pilloried for its fingerprint placement, isn't it?

If you buy this device, you're stuck with a crappy screen and hoping for a software update that might make it marginally better. Google could have and should have done better. Maybe they will with the 3 XL.

Displays are quite a bit more. Odds and end chips like wifi and accelerometers cost about that also all together. Today's curved 3d gorilla glass are probably more than that.

This is an opinion article just like reviews are strictly that The last review I believed was the time of the Nexus 5. I unbox it and this was my experience:.

I had to sell that phone immediately and go buy a Galaxy S4 at the time again. At the price point Google is putting this device out for If you're perfectly okay with that, that is fine.

It simply isn't acceptable. If Google wants to compete with Apple and Samsung and be an "Inspirational" and "Lifestyle" type of brand, they have to do better period.

The screen has completely taken this device out of the running for me. Feeling like an idiot and considering cancelling. These comments are hilarious!!!!!!!!!!! I don't know why people don't understand that for some people the screen doesn't have to be perfect.

Wireless charging is a waste to me. Headphone jack is worthless to me. Glad it works for you. I would guess if a poll were done though on components in a flagship cell phone to a large group: If it was the normal public "regular updates" wouldn't even make the top 8.

Only geeks like us care about updates, and I almost bought a pixel 2 xl, glad I waited til the reviews were in. Posted this in another comment thread; I handed my Pixel 2 xl to a friend who owns a Galaxy S8.

While he was holding it I told him about the screen issues. He used the phone for a few minutes and said, "what issues the screen looks fine to me. He's what I would call an average phone user.

I see the blue shift probably caused by the polarized filter, no burn in yet. I guess the case is solved then, no issues because your average friend didn't notice anything for 10 seconds holding it.

Watch MBK's review at He mirrors my thoughts exactly. Except he showed it to more than 1 person. Unfortunately this phone is not for you, and never will be. Wait for Pixel 3 with higher quality screen.

I agree the screen is not perfect. But I also believe it's not nearly as bad an issue as it's made out to be. The headphone jack is an absolute deal-breaker and I refuse to support any company that is removing it without providing some type of upgraded experience or actual benefit in its place.

I'll let the Pixel users do the beta testing. I agree for the most part but what's this about slow fingerprint sensors? Both my former 6p and current pxl unlock in less than a second so what do you consider fast?

You wrote an entire piece castigating the Note8 for its price, yet both here and in the review the high price of the Pixels has been glossed over. Shit journalism from Android police. It's gonna be only you writers and the shitty Google aosp fanboys in the end.

I think we're either coming to or have reached the point where software is more important than hardware, no matter how compromised the hardware is. Maybe with the rise of phones costing crazy tons of money, android may wish to reintroduce the google play edition flagships like yesteryear.

Which seems to be less of an issue now seeing how many people buy crazy expensive phones! Regular security updates 5. I'm keeping an eye on Nokia for now However, I might buy a used one to see it for myself.

I see a lot of people refer to sRGB as more accurate or natural than the oversaturated P3 and I wish people would stop because that's fundamentally inaccurate. A display being "accurate" or "calibrated" isn't based on what color space it uses, it's based on how closely it matches the intended color space.

And as far as being natural goes, well, P3 and all colorspaces wider than sRGB include more actual colors on the visible light spectrum than sRGB, so how could sRGB somehow be more natural?

Wouldn't a colorspace that includes more colors our eyes can see in real life by default be more "natural" than a color space that doesn't? So let me get this straight, because I still haven't really gotten it straight.

The screen on the Pixel 2 XL is considered bad for two reasons that I am seeing. The first reason being that the colors aren't as vibrant which can be remedied in a software update, as it appears that sRGB is enabled and can't be disabled in Developer Options like on previous phones as other OLED phones, the second being that there is a blue tint when viewing the phone at an angle if you view your phone at an angle during normal use, I reckon your opinion probably doesn't matter much, because who does that and for what purpose?

Are there any other reasons besides these two, aside from the banding issue that seems to be case by case at this point? If there are no other reasons, this whole "screen issue" seems to be overblown.

One of the main issues can easily be remedied with a software update. The other issue seems to be a non-issue, in my opinion. Sure, the screen is something you use This isn't me defending a bad screen, as I don't firmly believe at this point that there is actually a case for it even BEING a bad screen besides more overblown media reports that happen with some aspect of EVERY phone that comes out.

Two months from now no one will be talking about it anymore because it will be a non-issues as it should be now. I agree with what you say, just that there are 2 important things that made this blow this out of proportions apart from ppl loving drama or simply cause it's Google: Until the point that either: There could also be a third solution, like But if they do this 3 months from now, it just won't matter anymore by then, we'll already talk about the spring flagships and the new Qualcomm SoC.

Either way, it's a hell of a situation here and I'm really curious how Google will handle it, they're all silent so far and this is bad. Also Verge's article is interesting about this matter theverge.

Luckily for me, I've never used a Samsung device for an extended period of time. I would hate to be jaded about a screen that looks more realistic than the over saturated crap that Samsung puts out.

This was laughably bad and sounded like a fanboys love letter to Google. This site needs to adopt a new rule: So in other words, David really likes it even though it has terrible shortcomings.

They moved from 1. The worst or best? So all that good can be done with a great screen, there's no excuse to this. Latest news Oreo 8. Hottest Hottest Latest Comments.

Article Contents 1 Before flaws, refinements 2 The good stuff only got better 3 As for the flaws 4 The screen thing. Tags editorial opinione pixel Pixel 2 pixel 2 xl subscribe.

It's back] Free alert: New options too] Speedtest v4. Orlando aka Pixel XL. David you are such a fanboy. Google provided this device. Would I still buy one for myself? Would the screen bother me any more or less?

The fanboyism is ridiculous. And I agree with Artem and David. Despite the screen, this is still the best device I've owned. I wouldn't read reviews of anything on the internet, ever, then.

Basically, there was one misstep, a big one, but I'm going to keep this phone in spite of it. After using the phone for a few days, I feel pretty certain that the screen isn't "garbage.

Samsung phones are usually unusable 6 months down the line due to lagfest I'm getting too good at these things. Pixel 3 will have wireless charging anyway. You got me, I had a rotary phone before my Pixel XL.

It's a hard life. That was probably my biggest issue. You use your phone while sleeping? I only use Samsung as an example because they operate as a trend setter for the industry.

How are those Samsung security updates working out for you? Eagerly awaiting my 2 XL. Someone above said it's just confirmation bias because I already bought the phone.

Damn, guess all the reasoning and research I did prior was for naught. Yeah, I'm not going to argue with you bud. To each his own. You do you friend. Note 8, S8 Future updates: Have you heard of wired connections over USB C.

A stupid argument was made, I continued with a stupid argument. Whatever you need to tell yourself to feel better. Got it, you're just trolling me at this point. Have fun with that.

To be fair, you said you would rather have a radio than a screen. So that's on you. Weird, because I can scroll up and easily confirm I said no such thing.

Then you said the screen. You do you, boo. And you do Google. Well if you don't have a screen, why would you care about portability lol. You can deactivate Bixby, a screen is not given such an easy fix.

We wanted to make limoncello but were unable to get our hands on enough lemons, so we made orangecello. A very nice drop it was too after a few months of aging. So we did have a few resources available.

But you are right, much care does need to be taken as some nasty by-products can be produced. Death can only occur if you use plastics etc that the ethanol vapours can leech say PVC for instance then yes, you can get very sick and almost die.

However, even a reasonable quality stainless reflux still will give you clear heads, middles and tails as long as you have an accurate digital thermometer.

Methanol vapours first heads so you keep it separate and add to the next wash just before distilling. You keep the middles up to about 79C on the thermometer and if you want, you can distill the tails up to about 83C and throw that into the next wash along side the metho just before the next distilling run.

Let it soak on activated carbon for a month or so and you will have a very clean and safe spirit to cut back and flavour as you like. The "methylated spirits" sold here is really almost put ethanol.

They stopped adding methanol due to the blindness caused in certain communities. Not sure if you can buy it, but they provide it in some of our labs at uni. No one's ever drunk it before heh.

I saw the title of this thread, and clicked on it, hoping to find out where to find pure alcohol Bob Lee Swagger writes Short of using it to burn things, I'd say that is the intent — care to ask her?

I'd say that is the intent — care to ask her? Kemenys in Bondi stock Spirytus, which will be fine for your purposes. It's sold mostly to people making Limoncello: Could be possible if there was a way of purifying it some how.

This is true, however a little cash and an online company called Livingstone www. Its not that expensive to build a vacuum still The whole concept behind distillation is that methanol boils off first and is thrown away the heads.

Now, for the average joe at home who only has access to his home kitchen gear The technical name is azeotrope. If the OP builds a still, you can use benzene to purify it further to absolute ethanol — yum!

The technique you describe is molecular sieving and is also described in the link below. You'd better have a good excuse ready when to try and explain to your insurance company why you blew your house up!

Im sure i can sell ya a bottle if ya like: I have no idea! This you can get in aus! When I had a lot of lemons during lemon season I looked into making Limoncello but wsa defeated by the alcohol thing.

Also though, the recipes seemed to result in something thin and vodka-y, while the Limoncello I'd seen in the shops appeared to be quite thick and yellow? I have a 2yo batch I am about to get into soon The thick and yellow limoncello uses Xanthan gum to thicken its about the only thing that will thicken ethanol.

If it's drinking, then you might like to investigate what high percentages of alcohol do to your stomach lining. Alcohol has a nasty tendency to kill living tissue. Using concentrated sulphric acid can desiccate most of the remaining water form the solution.

It's been denatured to make it taste bad. No prizes for guessing why. Most of it's nasty properties have already been covered. I used to make a lot of lemons into your classic preserved lemons, I make a lot of Morroccan stuff.

But found a brilliant cold salt indian pickle that actually does the same job, only better. Quince season is just ending here and I've poached a lot in light sugar syrup, ready for winter tagines. Also a ton of sugar can thicken it as well, I just found a Limoncello recipe on the net and had a look, I didnt realise there was so much sugar in it.

Well do let us know what happened. Now we know there's alcohol we can get, I think there's a number of us interested in the frillier aspects thickness, colour, taste! I'm pretty sure it's not lemon season though, they're bloody expensive in teh shops right now.

And no giant bags of lemons being passed around by neighbours and friends. And if you buy enough of the alcohol, I think they ship free I have no idea I would say a VERY large amount though good luck getting hold of it though unless you got a business with a liquor license for manufacturing alcohol.

You need to keep records of any spillages ect.. A kettle will do it easily, the problem is that being uncontrolled relatively it will flash the ethanol and it will be very hard to control to get any decent results.

My boiler for my distillation is just a w hot water heater element in a 60L 5L stainless container that the column seals onto. The recipes on the net I have found call for approx g of lemon rind that is the rind itself, not the peel or the fruit inside Damn, that's a pain you have to get the yellow zest, not the pith or flesh.

Painful job to get a lot of it. I wonder if a sharp spud peeler would work? Yes, A spud peeler works but still doesn't make it any easier. Get a zester one like this http: When I was "overseas" on K.

I think these people were sourcing from C. If you shoot them an E-mail I'm sure they will be happy to tell you more. I looked over the operation and tried the product and can recommend it!

The highest i've ever seen in other store were proof. This place sold proof: I'm living in Italy at the moment and have no idea why you'd wanna make limoncello haha.

I had to pretend that I liked some homemade stuff from a grandma which involved drinking a large glass while I was slowly dying inside. The store bought is ok, but really sugary.

Limencello isn't nearly as bad as grappa though. I love that place. The distillery guy looks like Doc Brown from Back to the Future! Hahaha I noticed that too This may have been from wikipedia so it's just as credible as heresay.

So in the context of this thread, you are quite right. Once you have your pure alcohol you then have the problem of storing it so that it doesn't absorb moisture from the air, which can be difficult but if you have a need for pure ethanol you probably have enough gear to take care of it.

You've got to put your alcohol through a molecular sieve, then peel the lemons Then the pharmacist might order you some. I don't know why you want it or what you are using it for, but don't drink it.

I'm quite sure it's deadly. According to my pharmacist it is. My old work was doing a trial producing pre-mixed alc products. They had to have special permission to get it transported and to buy it.

I think you would have a hard time getting hold of something like this. I know of some people that distill their own. The problem with this is that its illegal and you risk explosions.

Or has my mind just created this fact? I'm new to this site and was scanning re grain alcohol: For God's sake Do Not use isopropyl alcohol for food stuffs, it's carcinogenic and toxic in other ways, worse than methyl alcohol methanol, wood alcohol.

You might re-distill methylated spirits from the supermarket through pool filter activated charcoal. There's no methyl alcohol in it now days only "Bitrex" and dye, but it is not "grain alcohol'.

My info comes from 40 years of studying the extraction of essential oils and high purity fractional distillation. I must of tried 10 or more pharmacies Got about 10 litres of ethanol. Needed it for Marine Biology taxonomy.

There are plenty of different alcohol chemicals Might be worth researching a bit of organic chemistry before trying your hand at making spirits It's great for dehydrating tissue and is used as a cheap short term fixative.

You want this stuff in your body? Also some companies put additives into the EtOH to prevent twits drinking it. Mind you if anyone wants to drink it I would prefer they did, hopefully before procreation, so such idiocy can be removed from the gene pool.

It's difficult to find. Most alcohol is sold in Australia is It's also very expensive — it costs almost twice what other vodkas cost, even the purer ones. You're also going to be flavouring it, so I'm not not convinced there'll be a great or very noticeable difference in the end product.

It is not possible to distill a water and ethanol mixture to anything more concentrated than This is because water and ethanol form what is known as an Azeotropic mixture. With ethanol this is commonly benzene or cyclohexane.

Also water can be removed by use of calcium oxide which reacts with the water to form calcium hydroxide a solid that can be removed by filtration. Other methods include the use of molecular sieves - ceramics that have a strong affinity for water and can be removed when they have done their job.

Benzene is a powerful carcinogen and the trace amounts left in the alcohol would probably best be avoided. Methyl is the denaturant for Ethyl, a poison which deters people from distilling.

I was wondering this question when we were distilling salt water in High School. Surprised the teacher explained it to a curious 9th grader. Anon Was Here writes It's shame they can't sell E in service stations for fuel, just because of some nasty, stupid people.

Surely, the recipe doesn't call for moonshine and only moonshine to be used. I hope i am not the only person who read the title and thought, That's going to kill alot of germs.

At some stage we were low on stock and unable to order it any more as we needed a license to buy it. The liver converts it into Gammahydroxybutrate or GHB. If you mean as a drink? That won't be the reason.

The higher concentrations are typically made by adding something with a greater affinity for water than ethanol, such as anhydrous copper sulphate. Generally processes that don't associate well with stuff for human consumption.

My favourite usage for high grade alcohol that I've seen was the ultimate PC liquid cooling rig — submerse the entire motherboard in a bath of it. And keep a fire extinguisher close by!

Count me a skeptic that any Joe Blow can buy pure ethanol that you could add to any lolly water and safely get shickered on the cheap. In my book it's either doctored so you can't drink it, or you're paying hefty excise on it.

Yep, if they are bacteria — but you'll have to wait a few hours so it can penetrate the plaque and then the lipid coating, and hope too many spores don't form in the meantime to cross-infect.

As far as many viruses go, it could be pretty useless:. Don't believe everything the adverts tell you — especially if you are adolescent and think "medicated soap" will stop acne.

Coments:

21.03.2018 Digar :

Quarter Horses Questions including "Is an American quarter horse and a quarter horse the same" and "What behavior does a quarter horse have". Android Phones and Cheap Cell Phones. Chinavasion offers the best Android smartphones and cell phone accessories. The smartphones listed here. Explore the world of iPad. Check out iPad Pro, available in two sizes, iPad, and iPad mini. Visit the Apple site to learn, buy, and get support.

02.03.2018 Dotaxe :

Android Forums, News, Reviews, Help and Android Wallpapers. Jan 30, · Another masterpiece from the creators of Traffic Racer. This time, you are behind the wheels of a motorbike in a much more detailed gaming experience, but. Welcome to H&M, we offer fashion and quality clothing at the best price in a sustainable way. Become a H&M club member for free delivery and returns.

12.02.2018 Nikosida :

ATL battery cell and OVP anti-explosion, double safety guard. The ATL battery cell is as same as Apple. Compared with traditional battery, the Power 2 charges. Dec 30, · Hi, Just wondering where one might be able to buy % pure alcohol (for the purposes of making limoncello, an italian liqueur). I've been looking at the chemis. [ATTACH][ATTACH] M-HORSE PURE 2Especificaciones[SPOILER]INTRODUCCIÓNAún nos encontramos analizando el hermano pequeño de esta marca cuando ya nos encontramos anunciando este nuevo terminal.

7 inch android phones how to unlock - 4